Arundhati Roy evokes extreme reactions in me. She is hauntingly beautiful. But many a times her thoughts and actions are baffling. Here's the link to the article she recently wrote on Anna's agitation: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article2379704.ece?css=print
I could not sit quiet. Hence my response is in bold.
While his means maybe Gandhian, his demands are certainly not.
If what we're watching on TV is indeed a revolution, then it has to be one of the more embarrassing and unintelligible ones of recent times. For now, whatever questions you may have about the Jan Lokpal Bill, here are the answers you're likely to get: tick the box — (a) Vande Mataram (b) Bharat Mata ki Jai (c) India is Anna, Anna is India (d) Jai Hind.
My response: Common man is reacting to an opportunity to eradicate corruption through Anna Hazare's efforts. We all know that the contours of various versions of the Lokpal Bill are complicated for the common man to understand. The common man is reacting to the ends and not the means. To interpret their responses to suit your convenience and make fun of their emotions is unfair. It stinks of intellectual arrogance so common to your breed.
For completely different reasons, and in completely different ways, you could say that the Maoists and the Jan Lokpal Bill have one thing in common — they both seek the overthrow of the Indian State. One working from the bottom up, by means of an armed struggle, waged by a largely adivasi army, made up of the poorest of the poor. The other, from the top down, by means of a bloodless Gandhian coup, led by a freshly minted saint, and an army of largely urban, and certainly better off people. (In this one, the Government collaborates by doing everything it possibly can to overthrow itself.)
My response: By writing "an army of largely urban, and certainly better off people.", if the reference is to Anna's team - it consists of an eminent lawyer, an ex-IAS Officer and an ex-Chief of Police, a few educated RTI activitists and youth. Yes, they are all urban and better off people, but they do not behave like one. They have dedicated their lives for the cause of the poor in this country.
In case if you are referring to the crowds currently protesting on Ramlila Grounds and other cities, then yes, they comprise of largely middle class people. But haven’t the Mumbai Dabbahwalas gone on a token 1 day strike for the first time in some 80 odd years to support Anna? Even Commercial Sex Workers across the country are coming out on the roads in support of this cause. Are these “largely urban and better off people”?
And what is wrong with Urban and Better Off people protesting? Why does that bother you? Isn’t it the cause that matters? Moreover, how can one blame Team Anna for that?
If you recollect the freedom struggle, it all began with the planning and strategizing by the urban rich and thereafter percolated down to the poor. Ultimately we won freedom when the intellectuals used the power of the poor to negotiate with the British to get out of the country. A similar trend is happening here. So give this struggle some time. Don’t be impatient in reacting.
In April 2011, a few days into Anna Hazare's first “fast unto death,” searching for some way of distracting attention from the massive corruption scams which had battered its credibility, the Government invited Team Anna, the brand name chosen by this “civil society” group, to be part of a joint drafting committee for a new anti-corruption law. A few months down the line it abandoned that effort and tabled its own bill in Parliament, a bill so flawed that it was impossible to take seriously.
My response: By trivializing Anna Hazare and his team, one may win a few intellectual admirers, but it mirrors our own pettiness.
Then, on August 16th, the morning of his second “fast unto death,” before he had begun his fast or committed any legal offence, Anna Hazare was arrested and jailed. The struggle for the implementation of the Jan Lokpal Bill now coalesced into a struggle for the right to protest, the struggle for democracy itself. Within hours of this ‘Second Freedom Struggle,' Anna was released. Cannily, he refused to leave prison, but remained in Tihar jail as an honoured guest, where he began a fast, demanding the right to fast in a public place. For three days, while crowds and television vans gathered outside, members of Team Anna whizzed in and out of the high security prison, carrying out his video messages, to be broadcast on national TV on all channels. (Which other person would be granted this luxury?) Meanwhile 250 employees of the Municipal Commission of Delhi, 15 trucks, and six earth movers worked around the clock to ready the slushy Ramlila grounds for the grand weekend spectacle. Now, waited upon hand and foot, watched over by chanting crowds and crane-mounted cameras, attended to by India's most expensive doctors, the third phase of Anna's fast to the death has begun. “From Kashmir to Kanyakumari, India is One,” the TV anchors tell us.
My response: Hope you remember your dear friend Medha Patkar and her efforts during the Narmada Bachao Andolan. She too was fighting against the government might and extremely unreasonable in her demands. Was her “fast unto death” also flawed like Anna’s?
Media is all-pervasive. The most corrupt in this country use the media effectively to become saints, heroes and martyrs. The publicity hungry use it for their individual gains. Team Anna, on the other hand, is using the media to garner public support for a noble cause. Medha Patkar used it, Gandhiji used it, and so does Arundhati Roy. Just because we don't not agree with your views, can we assume that you have used your close connections in media to get your biased views published?
Your grouse against Anna being featured on national television while is Jail is a valid point. But the blame lies with Tihar officials and not Team Anna. Even the hasty decision to clean up the Ramlila Grounds depicts confusion in the Congress ranks. The media circus around Anna was also not created by him or his team. So what’s the point you want to make here?
While his means may be Gandhian, Anna Hazare's demands are certainly not. Contrary to Gandhiji's ideas about the decentralisation of power, the Jan Lokpal Bill is a draconian, anti-corruption law, in which a panel of carefully chosen people will administer a giant bureaucracy, with thousands of employees, with the power to police everybody from the Prime Minister, the judiciary, members of Parliament, and all of the bureaucracy, down to the lowest government official. The Lokpal will have the powers of investigation, surveillance, and prosecution. Except for the fact that it won't have its own prisons, it will function as an independent administration, meant to counter the bloated, unaccountable, corrupt one that we already have. Two oligarchies, instead of just one.
My response: You cannot fight new wars with old rules. People change, nations change, perspectives change too. Today the idea of non-violence, decentralisation as propagated by Gandhi may not work. Corruption has become a national pastime in this country. "Kuch kaam nahi? Chalo thoda corruption kar lete hain" - thats the attitude of the people in power. India loses close to Rs. 90,000 crores to corruption every year. How can a problem of such humungous proportions be resolved by a climate of consensus and debate? You would need some draconian means, atleast as a temporary measure, to counter corruption. Agree, Jan Lokpal Bill has its flaws. But who doesn't? Your unflinching support to the violent Maoists is also questionable. May be their demands are valid (I am no expert) but to support their violent means is unacceptable. You should be jailed as a Maoist supporter. But you are a free person and you are guided by your beliefs. And we respect that. So let Team Anna be. Give them some time before reacting so violently. Live and let live.
Whether it works or not depends on how we view corruption. Is corruption just a matter of legality, of financial irregularity and bribery, or is it the currency of a social transaction in an egregiously unequal society, in which power continues to be concentrated in the hands of a smaller and smaller minority? Imagine, for example, a city of shopping malls, on whose streets hawking has been banned. A hawker pays the local beat cop and the man from the municipality a small bribe to break the law and sell her wares to those who cannot afford the prices in the malls. Is that such a terrible thing? In future will she have to pay the Lokpal representative too? Does the solution to the problems faced by ordinary people lie in addressing the structural inequality, or in creating yet another power structure that people will have to defer to?
My response: Agree. The societal inequalities are of 2 kinds in India. One is the rich v/s the poor and the other is the powerful v/s the powerless. In a corrupt State, the second type of inequality is more prevalent (and dangerous) than the first one. The small minority that you are referring to consists of the politicians, the babus, the law and the police – The Powerful. The rest - whether the rich businessman or a middleclass clerk or a poor farmer are the Powerless. In a corrupt society, a poorly paid cop has the power to extract financial gains from rich yet powerless citizen. This is a structural inequality which the democratically elected Governments have not been able to address for the past 65 years. So how long should common man be patient? Why not give an alternate power structure a chance?
Meanwhile the props and the choreography, the aggressive nationalism and flag waving of Anna's Revolution are all borrowed, from the anti-reservation protests, the world-cup victory parade, and the celebration of the nuclear tests. They signal to us that if we do not support The Fast, we are not ‘true Indians.' The 24-hour channels have decided that there is no other news in the country worth reporting.
My response: If you think 100,000 flag waving people, braving the rains and traffic, gather at Ramlila or Bandra or elsewhere in the country to display a borrowed style of nationalism, you are sadly mistaken. Common man is smarter than you think. He knows this is his chance to tighten the noose around the corrupt Government’s neck. A fearless Anna and a spineless Government is a fortuitous opportunity for him to let go so easily. It is now or never. Aggressive nationalism is just a facade. Behind this facade is a strong resolve to wipe out corruption. Its appalling that you cannot sense this feeling. May be it is time for you to get up from your writing desk and go out to mingle with the common man once again.
The signal you get from media of not being a “true Indian” is a figment of your own artistic imagination. While we respect your views, nobody really cares whether a small minority like yours supports this fast. We do. And a billion Indians do. That’s what matters.
‘The Fast' of course doesn't mean Irom Sharmila's fast that has lasted for more than ten years (she's being force fed now) against the AFSPA, which allows soldiers in Manipur to kill merely on suspicion. It does not mean the relay hunger fast that is going on right now by ten thousand villagers in Koodankulam protesting against the nuclear power plant. ‘The People' does not mean the Manipuris who support Irom Sharmila's fast. Nor does it mean the thousands who are facing down armed policemen and mining mafias in Jagatsinghpur, or Kalinganagar, or Niyamgiri, or Bastar, or Jaitapur. Nor do we mean the victims of the Bhopal gas leak, or the people displaced by dams in the Narmada Valley. Nor do we mean the farmers in NOIDA, or Pune or Haryana or elsewhere in the country, resisting the takeover of the land.
‘The People' only means the audience that has gathered to watch the spectacle of a 74-year-old man threatening to starve himself to death if his Jan Lokpal Bill is not tabled and passed by Parliament. ‘The People' are the tens of thousands who have been miraculously multiplied into millions by our TV channels, like Christ multiplied the fishes and loaves to feed the hungry. “A billion voices have spoken,” we're told. “India is Anna.”
Who is he really, this new saint, this Voice of the People? Oddly enough we've heard him say nothing about things of urgent concern. Nothing about the farmer's suicides in his neighbourhood, or about Operation Green Hunt further away. Nothing about Singur, Nandigram, Lalgarh, nothing about Posco, about farmer's agitations or the blight of SEZs. He doesn't seem to have a view about the Government's plans to deploy the Indian Army in the forests of Central India.
My response: The people you refer are all victims of corruption some way or the other – be it Irom Sharmila or Koongakulam villagers, or agitated villagers or farmers or adivasis. So Anna’s fight is for all of them. For your information, Irom Sharmila has extended her strong support to Anna. It just goes on to show that what you mean is not what India means.
He does however support Raj Thackeray's Marathi Manoos xenophobia and has praised the ‘development model' of Gujarat's Chief Minister who oversaw the 2002 pogrom against Muslims. (Anna withdrew that statement after a public outcry, but presumably not his admiration.)
Despite the din, sober journalists have gone about doing what journalists do. We now have the back-story about Anna's old relationship with the RSS. We have heard from Mukul Sharma who has studied Anna's village community in Ralegan Siddhi, where there have been no Gram Panchayat or Co-operative society elections in the last 25 years. We know about Anna's attitude to ‘harijans': “It was Mahatma Gandhi's vision that every village should have one chamar, one sunar, one kumhar and so on. They should all do their work according to their role and occupation, and in this way, a village will be self-dependant. This is what we are practicing in Ralegan Siddhi.” Is it surprising that members of Team Anna have also been associated with Youth for Equality, the anti-reservation (pro-“merit”) movement? The campaign is being handled by people who run a clutch of generously funded NGOs whose donors include Coca-Cola and the Lehman Brothers. Kabir, run by Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia, key figures in Team Anna, has received $400,000 from the Ford Foundation in the last three years. Among contributors to the India Against Corruption campaign there are Indian companies and foundations that own aluminum plants, build ports and SEZs, and run Real Estate businesses and are closely connected to politicians who run financial empires that run into thousands of crores of rupees. Some of them are currently being investigated for corruption and other crimes. Why are they all so enthusiastic?
My response: Don’t be so caustic and personal. We all know about your past and your strong views on certain thorny issues. We could also be judgmental about them. But we choose to ignore it when we see you stand for something good. So give Team Anna a chance lady.
Remember the campaign for the Jan Lokpal Bill gathered steam around the same time as embarrassing revelations by Wikileaks and a series of scams, including the 2G spectrum scam, broke, in which major corporations, senior journalists, and government ministers and politicians from the Congress as well as the BJP seem to have colluded in various ways as hundreds of thousands of crores of rupees were being siphoned off from the public exchequer. For the first time in years, journalist-lobbyists were disgraced and it seemed as if some major Captains of Corporate India could actually end up in prison. Perfect timing for a people's anti-corruption agitation. Or was it?
My response: You are right. Couldn’t this be the perfect timing? I am an optimist and I would like to believe that the corrupt have merely delayed the inevitable rather than the defeatist thoughts that you propagate merely to malign Anna’s campaign.
At a time when the State is withdrawing from its traditional duties and Corporations and NGOs are taking over government functions (water supply, electricity, transport, telecommunication, mining, health, education); at a time when the terrifying power and reach of the corporate owned media is trying to control the public imagination, one would think that these institutions — the corporations, the media, and NGOs — would be included in the jurisdiction of a Lokpal bill. Instead, the proposed bill leaves them out completely.
My response: Nobody is saying the Jan Lokpal Bill is perfect. But lets table it. Lets make amendments later. But lets not do any further debates and standing committees. Lets not waste time and allow the slimy government to slip away. We know corruption will not go away just by approving Jan Lokpal. But lets take the first step boldly.
Now, by shouting louder than everyone else, by pushing a campaign that is hammering away at the theme of evil politicians and government corruption, they have very cleverly let themselves off the hook. Worse, by demonising only the Government they have built themselves a pulpit from which to call for the further withdrawal of the State from the public sphere and for a second round of reforms — more privatisation, more access to public infrastructure and India's natural resources. It may not be long before Corporate Corruption is made legal and renamed a Lobbying Fee.
Will the 830 million people living on Rs.20 a day really benefit from the strengthening of a set of policies that is impoverishing them and driving this country to civil war?
This awful crisis has been forged out of the utter failure of India's representative democracy, in which the legislatures are made up of criminals and millionaire politicians who have ceased to represent its people. In which not a single democratic institution is accessible to ordinary people. Do not be fooled by the flag waving. We're watching India being carved up in war for suzerainty that is as deadly as any battle being waged by the warlords of Afghanistan, only with much, much more at stake.
My response: Don’t be a pessimist just to prove an already weak argument. In these times of historic change, you need to give hope to this nation, not despair.